Pole Results
Impacts in Your State
Recent blog posts
- The smell of snow is in the air today and October woods - by Eric Orff
- ESPN Article: The hunter and conservation
- More than 670 Hunting and Fishing Groups Demand Climate Action
- Video from Carbon-Neutral Sailfish Tournament
- Scientists Sign Letter in Support of Global Warming Legislation
- Sailfish Tournament First Ever to be Carbon Neutral
- Hunter to Hunter: Huckabee on Climate Change
- Hunter Angler Fly-In a Success
- Impacts of Global Warming
- Great Article on Hunter/Angler Training in Iowa
Where to go?
Submitted by Derek Brockbank on Sat, 10/07/2006 - 2:40pm.
Right now at the National Wildlife Federation we are in the process of deciding upon which states we will focus our global warming work. We will certainly be working everywhere at least a little bit, but with limited resources we have to narrow down our focus to a limited number of states for in depth organizing and education.
Saying the decision is difficult doesn't come close to describing it. What do you think? If you had some money and staff to devote to global warming and wanted to educate and mobilize hunters, anglers and politicians, what state(s) would you choose?
Derek Brockbank's blog | login or register to post comments | email this page | printer friendly version
National Wildlife Federation Action Fund™ fights for the conservation interests of hunters, anglers and outdoor enthusiastsfrom all walks of life and political stripes. Like our sister organization, the National Wildlife Federation, NWF Action Fund is
committed to inspiring Americans to protect wildlife for future generations.
Contact Us
© 2008 National Wildlife Federation Action Fund | 11100 Wildlife Center Dr, Reston, VA 20910
All rights reserved. Read more about your privacy.
I would target West Virginia for education on global warming, also Pennsyvania and Kentucky. Coal country needs all the help and education if can get, and I believe they are open to listening to the message.